November 16, 2003

Calling the Alameda County Grand Jury! Oakland has yet another financial/ public works problem with the contractor who got the award to rehab part of our sanitary sewer system. This killer article is reprinted with permission of the MacArthur Metro

I Smell a Rat: Investigating Oakland's Sanitary Sewer System Rehab Program
by Dennis Evanosky

A few weeks ago I got a phone call from Laurel resident Andrew Vincent. He invited me to his neighborhood to see firsthand the way Andes Construction was rehabilitating the sanitary sewer line.

I took a walk with Vincent, and along the way he pointed out what he felt was the shoddy job Andes was performing. We first stopped at the Berlin Branch of Peralta Creek that runs along Hillview Street just behind Vincent's home. As we walked, he explained that he had already questioned the city how Andes Construction could repair the sewer main along the creek without the proper permit. His inquiry caused a halt in the work on the creek portion of the project. Andes has yet to obtain the creek permit.

At first, Vincent's allegations struck me as technical. However, as the walk progressed, even I saw how Andes Construction is not doing parts of the job as outlined in the city's own "spec book," its ordinances, and according to the pipe manufacturer's instructions.

"There are places on this job that Andes Construction is supposed to be using activated oakum to seal annular spaces," Vincent explained. He handed me a discarded scrap of oiled ropelike material that he said was a piece of oiled oakum that Andes is using on the job. Oiled oakum is not what the spec book calls for, according to Vincent. "There are also places that the crew is using no oakum at all," he said.

In addition, Vincent says that Andes construction is supposed to be using Type V grout. "Once, when I mentioned this to a city inspector, he checked with the crew and found that the crew had no Type V grout," he said.

No activated oakum? No type V grout? What can this mean? Vincent explained that unless Andes uses activated oakum and Type V grout where the specs require them, the system will leak and allow rain water into the sanitary sewer system.

"Rain water does not belong in the sewer system," Vincent said. "In fact, eliminating rain water from the system is the main goal in rehabbing the sewer system."

He then handed me the manufacturer's instructions that say, "Heater plate thermometers should be checked with ... crayon indicators (melt sticks) at least once a day." He also turned to a page in the city's own spec book that requires the use of "a thermal crayon." He said when he asked the Andes crew, he was told Andes doesn't use one.

The city called Vincent, asking where it says the crew had to have these thermal crayons.

"The third sentence in 500-1.3.6.1 in your own spec book," he told them. "And in the manufacturer's 'Heat Fusion Joining Procedures' instruction manual." Shouldn't both the city and Andes Construction know and adhere to the job specs and the manufacturer's instructions?

There's more: Andes is supposed to install test wyes at all easement lateral connections. This is not being done. Vincent said that a city employee told him the city decided not to install these wyes, even though the spec book and, more important, the municipal code, requires them.

Vincent says that Andes Construction is using bedding material larger than that permitted in the specifications.

On at least one occasion, he witnessed an Andes Construction crew connecting laterals without a city inspector present. Municipal code requires that, "All connections to public or common private sewers shall be made in the presence of the Director of Public Works or his or her representative."

He also witnessed an Andes Construction crew using a crescent wrench to trim sewer pipe ends. "A crescent wrench leads to ragged, leaky connection rather than the clean, square cut outlined in the specifications," Vincent said.

The taxpayers are paying Andes Construction for among other aspects of the job each lateral it connects. Laterals are the sewer lines that lead from the sewer main to individual properties. Should a lateral be connected to an abandoned property?

For example, a lateral in Vincent's neighborhood leads onto the driveway where there is no longer a house. This lateral is only one Andes Construction has connected, and may bill the city for, leading nowhere.

Vincent pointed out that these abandoned laterals would cause rainwater to flow into the sewer system. Remember, it's supposed to flow into storm drains and creeks. He also says that these abandoned laterals provide an outlet for sewer rats to enter the neighborhood.

So imagine the abandoned lateral as a highway for rainwater one way and rats the other. The rats could come out of this lateral to nowhere and onto public property and into homes and parks where children play. Not a pretty picture.

The Public Works manager for the job phoned the Metro asking us not to print this article. In the public interest, we decided to make these allegations available to our readers.

Stay tuned.

Andrew Vincent documented and photographed the following deficiencies in the sanitary sewer rehab conducted by the Andes Construction Co. for the Public Works Agency of Oakland, fall 2003 in the Bret Harte Area. He has concurrence in these allegations from a licensed civil engineer with expertise in sewer work

1) No annular space sealing at exposed main and lateral locations. Spec book 500-1.3, 7.1, Public Works handout Checklist for Trenchless Building Sewer Replacement Methods.

2) No test wyes at easements. Oakland Municipal Code 13.08.370. Spec Book 500-4.d

3) House connection cleanouts not as per City of Oakland Standard Detail D-24. Spec Book 500-4.2 Public Works handout cited.

4) No leakage testing possible because no test wyes. Spec Book 306-1.4.1.

5) Leaky crescent wrench cuts at existing building sewer connection. Spec Book 500-4.2 4th paragraph.

6) Backfilling of building sewer connections completed nefore testing. Spec Book 306-1.4.1.

7) Pipe couplings not as per greenbook section 208.

8) Improper bedding and backfilling methods and materials used.Spec. Book 306-1.2.1, Public Works handout cited.

9) Heat fusion of HDPE pipe and fittings improperly performed. Manufactureres instructions not followed and cautions ignored. Rinker materials RECOMMENDED HEAT FUSION JOINING PROCEDURES

10) Improper or no test pig used before sliplining.Spec Book 500-1.3.6.

11) Point repair not completed before sliplining. Spec Book 500-1.3.6.

12) Rocks, broken VCP, and debris pulled into annular space during sliplining.


13) Liner is undersized. 500-1.3.1

14) Improper bonding agent (Dap 230 brilliant white latex caulk) used for saddles. Spec Book 500-1.1.7a

15) Liner cut for inactive laterals. Spec Book cited

16) Dye tests not performed. Spec Book cited.

17) Abandoned house connections not properly plugged/cut back. Spec Book 500-4.5

18) Inadequate cover of laterals. Spec Book 500-4.3.b, Public Works handout Checklist for Building Sewer Inspections.

19) No inspection of laterals prior to lining, Public Works handout cited.



Comments...

Thanks Jeanette.

I hope this article will anger more than a few of you activists out there.

I've written parts two (November Metro) and three (appearing soon in the December Metro) of this series for the Metro and part four will appear in the February Metro. (We don't publish in January.)

Jeanette is right, everybody. This is the sloppiest, most absurd example of a taxpayer ripoff that I've ever reported on. (I've been writing my Metro column for 10 years.

Jean Quan, our elected representative, is ignoring this and her staff is making jokes about it.

One of the biggest creeps involved called Toni Locke, the Metro's editor, and tried to intimidate her saying it would be in the Metro's best interest NOT to run the story.

Oh really?

Help us put a stop to this.

Dennis Evanosky

Posted by: Dennis Evanosky on November 17, 2003 07:37 AM

Just one more thing.

Toni Locke insisted that we lay this at the doorstep of the person responsible, Oakland's Public Works "Director" Claudette Ford.

Give her a call at 510-238-3961 or e-mail her at crford@oaklandnet.com and let her know what you think.

City Attorney John Russo has promised to look into this, but we feel that's dying on the vine.
Why not give him at call? 510-238-3601; his e-mail: jrusso@oaklandnet.com.

Thanks again, Jeannette.

Dennis Evanosky

Posted by: Dennis Evanosky on November 17, 2003 08:05 AM

Come on sports fans -- let's hear about you making those calls and sending those emails. I've called the DA's office (no reply) but a friend heard back from John Russo's office saying they're looking into it.

Jean Quan? Claudette Ford? Jerry Brown? All three of them seem intent on ignoring this fiasco. You wouldn't think that Andes Construction has any
financial links to anyone in the city, would you?
Its CEO is Ray Sanchez. Ray used to be an Oakland
building inspector.

Nah, building inspectors are never on the take, and
neither are councilmembers. But wait, a random thought...many of the current council members also voted for Andes (the highest bidder)and are the same people who voted for the Oracle computer contract, the most obviously stupid and ill-advised contract since we promised sell-outs at Raiders games.
Coincidence? You judge that while I take my pink-haired dog out for a walk to cut some pure
black roses under a green cheese moon.

Posted by: Jeannette on November 17, 2003 08:29 PM

The City Auditor concluded that it would be reasonable to award this contract to the high bidder(Andes Construction). Here is the link http://www.oaklandauditor.com/reports/andes_macarthurblvd.html

Andes Construction web site describes the owners 15 years as a City of Oakland public works inspector. Here is the link. http://www.andesconstruction.net/aboutus2.html

Posted by: Andrew Vincent on November 17, 2003 10:19 PM

Never Mind

Posted by: MM on November 19, 2003 04:03 PM

How about you get the information that you use in these ridiculous articles right, before you go off criticizing a company that has done more right than wrong for this city... To begin, Ray Sanchez, is not even an employee over at Andes; if you would actually do some kind of investigative reporting you would know that the SUPERINTENDENT at Andes is Ron Sanchez. Now as for the supposed financial links that Andes may have with the city of Oakland, I think those comments are completely bogus, and not called for, you have got some nerve making those kinds of remarks. Furthermore, your reporting is worse than anything I have ever seen. How about you pay attention to the letter that the City of Oakland sent to all us homeowners, detailing why Andes was performing some of the items on the job, different from that the handbook says. Basically, I just want to get across that the accusations that you and your paper are throwing around are so bogus, that I think you don't even believe them. You have some nerve accusing a Small Local business of bribing city leaders. Please oh please, is that what this City has come to, a bunch of people that have nothing better to do with their lives than to make false accusations, is that really the image that we want of Oakland. Find something better to do and leave the company to do what they came to do, fix the sewers in this City, and you'll see the final product is something that will last a long time, and we WILL get our money's worth.

Posted by: Sandra Goldman on November 30, 2003 02:31 AM

*This discussion has been closed. No more comments may be added.*