A Citizens Appeal to a General in a Time of War (at Home) by Michael Moore

Dear General Wesley Clark,

I've been meaning to write to you for some time. Two days after the Oscars, when I felt very alone and somewhat frightened by the level of hatred toward me for daring to suggest that we were being led into war for "fictitious reasons," one person stuck his neck out and came to my defense on national television.

And that person was you.

Aaron Brown had just finished interviewing me by satellite on CNN, and I had made a crack about me being "the only non-general allowed on CNN all week." He ended the interview and then turned to you, as you were sitting at the desk with him. He asked you what you thought of this crazy guy, Michael Moore. And, although we were still in Week One of the war, you boldly said that my dissent was necessary and welcome, and you pointed out that I was against Bush and his "policies," not the kids in the service. I sat in Flint with the earpiece still in my ear and I was floored -- a GENERAL standing up for me and, in effect, for all the millions who were opposed to the war but had been bullied into silence.

Since that night, I have spent a lot of time checking you out. And what I've learned about you corresponds to my experience with you back in March. You seem to be a man of integrity. You seem not afraid to speak the truth. I liked your answer when you were asked your position on gun control: "If you are the type of person who likes assault weapons, there is a place for you -- the United States Army. We have them."

In addition to being first in your class at West Point, a four star general from Arkansas, and the former Supreme Commander of NATO -- enough right there that should give pause to any peace-loving person -- I have discovered that...

1. You oppose the Patriot Act and would fight the expansion of its powers. 2. You are firmly pro-choice. 3. You filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan's affirmative action case. 4. You would get rid of the Bush tax "cut" and make the rich pay their fair share." 5. You respect the views of our allies and want to work with them and with the rest of the international community. 6. And you oppose war. You have said that war should always be the "last resort" and that it is military men such as yourself who are the most for peace because it is YOU and your soldiers who have to do the dying. You find something unsettling about a commander-in-chief who dons a flight suit and pretends to be Top Gun, a stunt that dishonored those who have died in that flight suit in the service of their country.

General Clark, last night I finally got to meet you in person. I would like to share with others what I said to you privately: You may be the person who can defeat George W. Bush in next year's election.

This is not an endorsement. For me, it's too early for that. I have liked Howard Dean (in spite of his flawed positions in support of some capital punishment, his grade "A" rating from the NRA, and his opposition to cutting the Pentagon budget). And Dennis Kucinich is so committed to all the right stuff. We need candidates in this race who will say the things that need to be said, to push the pathetically lame Democratic Party into having a backbone -- or get out of the way and let us have a REAL second party on the ballot.

But right now, for the sake and survival of our very country, we need someone who is going to get The Job done, period. And that job, no matter whom I speak to across America -- be they leftie Green or conservative Democrat, and even many disgusted Republicans -- EVERYONE is of one mind as to what that job is:

Bush Must Go.

This is war, General, and it's Bush & Co.'s war on us. It's their war on the middle class, the poor, the environment, their war on women and their war against anyone around the world who doesn't accept total American domination. Yes, it's a war -- and we, the people, need a general to beat back those who have abused our Constitution and our basic sense of decency.

The General vs. the Texas Air National Guard deserter! I want to see that debate, and I know who the winner is going to be.

The other night, when you were on Bill Maher's show, he began by reading to you a quote from Howard Dean where he (Dean) tried to run away from the word "liberal." Maher said to you, "So, General, do you want to run away from that word? Without missing a beat, you said "No!" and you reminded everyone that America was founded as a "liberal democracy." The audience went wild with applause.

That is what we have needed for a long time on our side -- guts. I am sure there are things you and I don't see eye to eye on, but now is the time for all good people from the far left to the middle of the road to bury the damn hatchet and get together behind someone who is not only good on the issues but can beat George W. Bush. And where I come from in the Midwest, General, I know you are the kind of candidate that the average American will vote for.

Michael Moore likes a general? I never thought I'd write these words. But desperate times call for desperate measures. I want to know more about you. I want your voice heard. I would like to see you in these debates. Then let the chips fall where they may -- and we'll all have a better idea of what to do. If you sit it out, then I think we all know what we are left with.

I am asking everyone I know to send an email to you now to encourage you to run, even if they aren't sure they would vote for you. (Wesley Clark's email address is: info@leadershipforamerica.org). None of us truly know how we will vote five months from now or a year from now. But we do know that this race needs a jolt -- and Bush needs to know that there is one person he won't be able to Dukakisize.

Take the plunge, General Clark. At the very least, the nation needs to hear what you know about what was really behind this invasion of Iraq and your fresh ideas of how we can live in a more peaceful world. Yes, your country needs you to perform one more act of brave service -- to help defeat an enemy from within, at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, an address that used to belong to "we, the people."

Yours,

Michael Moore

Environmental Background on Wesley Clark (not part of Michael Moore's piece)

Wesley K. Clark (D) General U.S. Army, Retired

Born: December 23, 1944; Little Rock AR Education: West Point Military Academy, 1966; Oxford U., M.A 1968 Family: Wife, Gert; one child, Wesley Website: www.americansforclark.com

Wesley Clark, running as a moderate Southern Democrat, brings a strong foreign policy and military background to the 2004 primary race but lacks any national political experience. A Rhodes Scholar who graduated first in his class from West Point, Clark is a retired, well decorated four-star General. Considered a centrist and often drawing comparison to fellow Arkansan Bill Clinton, Clark supports female reproductive rights, affirmative action, improved health care coverage, and tax cuts for the middle class.

Described as one of the most outspoken critics of Bushs Iraq policy" (Washington Post, September 17, 2003), Clarks distinguished military career will allow him to neutralize the Republican defense argument. Clarks military background is also anticipated to take a chunk out of John Kerrys support base, to date the only other candidate with significant military experience. Clarks lack of domestic policy experience represents his greatest liability but has the potential to work in his favor, providing footing as a non-politician," when taking on Bush.

In the months leading up to his announcement, Clark surrounded himself with key staff from the Clinton-Gore administration. Having jumped into the race late, he will benefit from already having a large volunteer and fundraising base in place through the Draft Clark campaign. This largely internet-based activist support structure is also expected to eat into Deans virtual monopoly on cyberspace activists."

Political Experience: Has never held elected office

Professional Experience: Chairman and CEO, Wesley K. Clark & Associates (strategic advisory and consulting firm) Managing Director, Merchant Banking of Stephens Group, Inc., March 2001- February 2003 Military and international affairs commentator, CNN

Military Experience: Four-Star General, United States Army 1966-2000; retired NATO Supreme Allied Commander, 1997-2000 Director of Strategic Plans and Policy for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1994-1996. Commander in Chief of the United States Southern Command (Latin America and Caribbean), 1996-1997

Statements on the Environment: "As you look at where we are in this country, a hundred years from now, none of us, probably, will be here. But basically, a hundred years out you have to think of the environment and your legal, constitutional institutions. And if you're going to work the environment and those institutions, that work has to start today. Because, it takes a hundred years to work effectively and protect the great gifts we've been given in this country. A hundred years from now, it's going to be very important that we make America a beautiful, safe land. We want our grandchildren to really love it here. We want people from all over the world to come here. We want it to be a natural, a national park, a treasure, all over the world. We can do that but we have to start now." (Speech to the New Democratic Network Jun 17, 2003)

"There are two big legacies we leave to our children: Constitutional government, and the environment itself. Every day we wait the problems accumulate and get worse. We should work right now on clean air, clean water, and climate change. We need to support upgrades to air pollution controls, for example -- a lot of measures have been rolled back by the Administration." (The Connection with Dick Gordon, NPR radio Sep 8, 2003)

Global Warming "Human beings do affect the environment and all you have to do is fly along the Andes and look at the disappearing glaciers down there and you recognize that there is something called global warming and it's just getting started as China and India modernize." (Speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, 02/20/03)

Energy "I am not one of those people who will rule out nuclear energy as a contributor to dealing with the energy problem. We've just got lots of things we need to do on energy conservation and energy generation, and especially renewable energy resources. The means are out there now to take a much greater percentage of our energy needs from the sun, from solar, and from wind, and even from wave action. And I would hope that we would move ahead in those areas much more rapidly than we have been." (WCGU-FM interview on "Sound Off With Sasha" Jun 27, 2003)

Arctic Refuge Opposes drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge on the grounds that "the gains in terms of US energy independence are relatively marginal" (from the Diane Rehm Show, August 1, 2003)

"[Drilling in Alaska] is an important question, both for the environmental movement and the energy issue. In general, I am inclined not to support drilling in the National Wildlife Refuge. I've looked at the issue, but the gains in terms of US energy independence are relatively marginal. It's an important redline in terms of trying to protect a pristine area in the environment." (WMUR-FM, The Diane Rehm Show Jul 23, 2003)

Fuel Efficiency "For more than 100 years, the internal combustion engine has been the system of choice for automobiles and many other vehicles. Although electric motors have been available since the early 1800s, no one has been able to create a motor architecture that is small enough, light enough, yet powerful enough to propel an automobile reliably and efficiently - until now. I believe that [newly developed] electric motors have a chance to be the propulsion system of choice for the twenty-first century." (Tom Junod, "The General," Esquire Aug 1, 2003)

Kyoto Treaty Clark has stated that he would have renegotiated the Kyoto Agreement instead of rejecting it. Pointing to concerns over the difficulties that arise in pursuing international cooperation on a range of issues that result from the Bush Administrations pattern of rejecting international agreements. (Gerry Krownstein, "The CNN General," New York Stringer Jul 1, 2003)