August 16, 2002

Iím WatchingÖby Hugh Bassette

Are We There Yet ?

All of us probably remember family trips where our youthful excitement wanted us to get to our destination as soon as possible and we continued to pester our parents with the question, "Are we there yet?" I just came from a city council meeting and it seemed that the entire meeting revolved around this question.

The issues were the A's stadium and the Forest City housing project. I find myself in a strange place on this issue.


I have sided with the rich. For an in-the-closet socialist that can be disheartening. But let's face it: For years the City has attempted to lure big business back to downtown only to be spurned like a lovesick suitor. We did everything besides give away the store and sometimes we did that, too. There was even a plan one time to have the John Williams Freeway run right into the parking lot of City Center so a suburbanite would never actually have to set foot on Oakland soil. Jerry Brown's 10K proposal is the most realistic one to come down the pike in years. If companies like Macy's can see a sizable profit if they come to Oakland, then they will come. Putting
10,000 Oakland residents with incomes between $50,000 and $70,000 will turn the head of any corporation especially now that the public spotlight is on them.

I remember when I first came to Oakland and I heard Leo Bazile say that the problem with Oakland is that it has too many poor people. At the time I thought that that statement was appalling. How could any Black man say that? Years later I agree with him. A city full of welfare recipients cannot support a business community. Does that mean that we should run the poor out of town? No! It means that we should provide the necessary
education and training to turn Oakland residents into viable consumers. Then we would not have to travel out of town to the suburban malls surrounding us.

I remember when you would go downtown Oakland and the streets would be full of pedestrians and shoppers. Liberty House, Florshein's, the Emporium are names that we all remember.

The bottom line is I support the Foster City proposal because it is the most viable plan for downtown economic development that I have seen in 25 years. Yes, it is housing for the rich and well to do, but don't they have a place in Oakland too? Oaklanders always brag about their diversity. Shouldn't we have economic diversity as well as cultural diversity? Suffer the rich for they will be with us always.



Comments...

hey mr. bassatte....i just want to say nice article, see you around and best of luck!
your 01' economic student.

Posted by: phuong le on August 27, 2002 12:21 PM

Sorry, Mr. Bassette -- we don't buy it.

If it takes a city subsidy of 96% (as reported in the East Bay Express) to get this housing built, then the market clearly isn't there -- at least with this developer.

Heck, if we told Donald Trump that we'd build the whole thing, that it wouldn't cost him a dime, and he could just sit back in Manhattan and accept the rent checks, don't you think he'd be here in a New York minute?

Nope, nope, nope.

We have to stop throwing good money after bad.

Posted by: KIJE Project on September 10, 2002 05:45 PM

Dear Mr. Bassette,

That was an excellent article on Oakland's Economic problem. I feel the same way about it. Oakland does need to bring in big businesses to get the money following and to improve our streets. I would like Oakland to have a mall that has the same popular stores like Southland, Newpark mall, and Stonerige. It is a hassell to drive 30 to 40 minutes to find the close I like to wear. More power to you Mr. bassette.

Posted by: Martin A. Martinez on September 30, 2002 10:50 AM

Leo Bazile was right -the income level of Oakland citizens is loo low. One way to increase the overall income level in Oakland is to create an environment that attracts good jobs to Oakland. Currently, the City has one of the highest tax rates in the Bay Area (And folks working under the City of Oakland's Budget Director actually believe the tax rates do not effect business attraction or retention!- I have asked them directly - in front of the former Director, Deborah Edgerly!). We have an onerous building department... Is it the culture in City Government? Look around at the new developement in our neighboring cities: San Leandro, Emeryville, Alameda, EVEN Berkeley(!)... what are we missing?? They have less expensive government and yet things work better.... They have less complicated procedures, and things work better... They have less government, and things work better... OK, I'll stop.

Posted by: Randy Reed on July 28, 2003 12:19 AM

*This discussion has been closed. No more comments may be added.*